To read the entire article click here.
I’m not one to buy in to conspiracy theories, but then again when 89% of all desktop computers are running the same Operating System it takes many less people to make a mistake, or even conjure up a devious plot. Don’t get me wrong, Microsoft make some good products, like Viseo for instance. I also like share point a lot.
Still that doesn’t make up for the rampant security holes(most recently conficker.c), back channel patent trolling, product delays or the price of a copy of Vista. All of these reasons are caused(or at least impacted) by protecting the Windows Monopoly. Most monopolies wreck havoc on a free market place. Microsoft has been sued repeatedly since the mid 90’s by the U.S. Attorney General, state and foreign governments. The complaints are that Microsoft are usually the same. Price fixing(via market share), effort to push proprietary software and communication standards, and bundling additional software with Windows to kill off the third party ISV competition.
The truth is though, that Windows OS is not the ‘bread and butter’ of profits. Office is. Someday, long after Balmer is gone, some brave executive in Redmond will come to the conclusion that ‘open standards and customer choice’, is the best long term business model. Someday Microsoft will give up it’s Windows monopoly because they realize that competition will drive them to innovate over litigate. The hundreds of billions in anti-trust settlements could go back to share holders and consumers. Since Microsoft makes the most money on it’s office suite anyway, they could still potentially grow there revenues while loosing Operating System market share. Some day.